Page 1 of 1
Dean guitars
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:54 am
by morgbite
Ive heard they have a really fat neck. To anyone who has a Dean or has played one, how does it compare to the neck of an epihpone les paul?
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:13 am
by S
tastes like chicken
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:43 pm
by BLAK2TH
dean necks are sorta fat, i never played an epiphone to compare
Re: Dean guitars
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:14 pm
by croninburg
morgbite wrote:Ive heard they have a really fat neck. To anyone who has a Dean or has played one, how does it compare to the neck of an epihpone les paul?
Les pauls are fairly chunky aren't they? My friends dad has one, i can't really remember how it plays though.
Re: Dean guitars
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:17 pm
by Balls On Parade
croninburg wrote:morgbite wrote:Ive heard they have a really fat neck. To anyone who has a Dean or has played one, how does it compare to the neck of an epihpone les paul?
Les pauls are fairly chunky aren't they? My friends dad has one, i can't really remember how it plays though.
yes, they are quite chunky, older Deans are similar, but I haven't played a newer one to be able to tell...
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:32 pm
by warhead dime
i have 2 deans. a dean ml 79 and a dean ml F 79.
you might think theyre the same thing but the ml F has a floyd rose and thats the only difference.
the ml actually has a really lightweight body and a relatively thin neck. the ml F has a mid weight body and a kind of thick neck, i wouldnt call it fat, just a little chunky. i prefer the feel to the ml F much more than the ml's thinner neck
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:56 pm
by morgbite
Im thinking about getting the V79 with no floyd rose.
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:34 pm
by warhead dime
i didnt know they had dean Vs with floyd roses
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:36 pm
by Jefferino
i know this is a guitar thread- but my Warwick is like holding a 2x4
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 9:28 pm
by Wrona
I fucked with a really cheap ml at a&r music and the neck was pretty damn big,i felt like i was playing my old les paul.I dont really like les paul necks. Hopefully all dean necks arent that fat.
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 4:20 pm
by Vinnie P
My bro has a Dean Baby ML and an Epiphone Les Paul and they are both sitting beside me. Maybe it's just becuase it's a 'Baby' but there isn't much difference in them. I prefer the Dean to the Epiphone.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 2:05 pm
by slayermaggot
I have a dean ml and its neck is fairly thin its not the smallest neck ive ever played but i like it that way
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 3:06 pm
by Deanbag
It has a neck like a baseball bat and the guitar has the breaking strain of a kit-kat.
AVOID Dean guitars and stick with the Washburn Dime series.
You have been warned.
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 3:20 pm
by Pantera420
Deanbag wrote:AVOID Dean guitars and stick with the Washburn Dime series.
You have been warned.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 4:57 am
by warhead dime
warhead dime wrote:i have 2 deans. a dean ml 79 and a dean ml F 79.
you might think theyre the same thing but the ml F has a floyd rose and thats the only difference.
the ml actually has a really lightweight body and a relatively thin neck. the ml F has a mid weight body and a kind of thick neck, i wouldnt call it fat, just a little chunky. i prefer the feel to the ml F much more than the ml's thinner neck
ah i fucked up bad. i meant that the only difference between em ISNT just that one has a floyd and the other doesnt.