Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:04 pm
axlash wrote:nola, but 2 is very very very fuckin close.
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 6:25 am
Depends on which demos you talk about.dead forever wrote:Fantomas wrote:pre-nola
The demos?
I think they sound kinda fucked up in places, his voice sounds too high to sing those songs.
The 10 song demo from around 1992 kicks ass.
Sounds great compared to the ones from the original cassette demos.
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:24 am
No contest.
Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 4:05 pm
<THe_FeAR> wrote:axlash wrote:nola, but 2 is very very very fuckin close.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:54 am
Nola for sentimental reasons as wells as anything else. Eyes of the South is one of the greatest songs ever IMO.
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:37 am
THEY'RE BOTH SHITTY. i fonly Phil could sing and pepper could play. what a waste of time and space. DOWN is exactly the name for the band...lol
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:06 pm
HAHA ROFL OMGZ U SHOWED DEM HOMBOYZ
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:52 am
Dime_333 wrote:THEY'RE BOTH SHITTY. i fonly Phil could sing and pepper could play. what a waste of time and space. DOWN is exactly the name for the band...lol
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:22 am
Nola for me,but Down II was close.
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:56 pm
They're both great but I actually prefer Down II. The musicianship is just tighter and it just feels like they're a real band instead of just a side project.
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 7:06 pm
it's all sleeper shit 
................................it all sucks to me ...they're lame...and as i have said before ...fuc anything phil dose now....glad youall enjoy it though. 
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 7:36 pm
Whaats ma drug oooff chooooiice .. ? i've only heard nola, i guess i'll have to put my vote on that
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:12 pm
there both badass albums I listen to them all the fuckin time you can't go wrong with either one
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:37 pm
7Dime7MetalMassacre wrote:<THe_FeAR> wrote:axlash wrote:nola, but 2 is very very very fuckin close.
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:20 pm
They're both extremly boring albums after a while. Not saying they arn't good. I would have to say II wins. Just because it's got a little bit more flow. Or maybe Nola...ah, shit. They both have there moments.
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:27 pm
I personally like the live album.
Re: NOLA or DOWN II
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:33 pm
stretch wrote:which Down album do you like better?
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:47 am
nola.... 
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:28 am
NOLA
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:01 pm
II
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:44 am
Haven't heard Down II. Link to download it. Now.
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 11:43 am
NOLA
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:55 am
II is slower... but tighter. Just edges over for me, with Lies... I Don't Know What They Say...
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:17 pm
II...Hammond organ solo.
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:09 pm
<THe_FeAR> wrote:axlash wrote:nola, but 2 is very very very fuckin close.
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:33 pm
2 Where I'm going sends chills down my spine, and into my asshole
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:53 pm
Nola
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:12 pm
Gotta go with NOLA
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:31 am
Gnarkiller wrote:2 Where I'm going sends chills down my spine, and into my asshole
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:23 am
Nola feels like it's diriter and has more grit. It's raw.
2 is more polished and has some stronger more original songs
like There's Something On My Side, Meggido, and Lies.
But overall Nola kicks me harder. I pick NOLA.
2 is more polished and has some stronger more original songs
like There's Something On My Side, Meggido, and Lies.
But overall Nola kicks me harder. I pick NOLA.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:42 am
II by far.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:42 am
II by far.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:30 pm
NOLA is a great album, some awesome songs but there are also some I end up skipping. Down II I can listen to the whole way through, and it's also a lot more diverse and covers a lot more ground than NOLA.
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:33 pm
NOLA by far. I didn't dig II all that much, to be honest.
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:46 pm
Of course .... NOLA ;)
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:34 am
Far Beyond Driven
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:43 pm
I heard II before I heard NOLA so I'm going to have to say NOLA though my favorite song of theirs (Bury Me in Smoke) is on NOLA. The third one isn't that bad either.
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 12:56 am
Upgrayedd wrote:I heard NOLA before I heard NOLA so I'm going to have to say NOLA though my favorite song of theirs (NOLA) is on NOLA. NOLA isn't that bad either.
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:24 pm
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:27 pm
YO DAWG I HEARD YOU LIKE NOLA SO WE PUT NOLA IN YOUR NOLA SO YOU CAN NOLA WHILST YOU NOLA!!!Upgrayedd wrote:I heard II before I heard NOLA so I'm going to have to say NOLA though my favorite song of theirs (Bury Me in Smoke) is on NOLA. The third one isn't that bad either.