What, so a man can't admire another man's calves without being called gay now? Freakin' grow up kid.CliffandJason-BASS wrote:if you liked his calves, then your gay.

can you explain metal magic, projects in the jungle, power metal? did these albums not exist?walnut wrote:Maybe YOU should do some research. Zakk played guitar for Ozzy when he left Black Sabbath and started a solo career...in 1980.walking_ash wrote:Both, being almost the same age, started playing about the same time in their lives. Dime has been doing Pantera since '82, Zakk joined Ozzy in '87, and was unknown before that. Now, how in the fuck did Zakk Wylde teach Dime how to play when Dime was playing long before they ever met? You have an entire knowledge-base - known as the internet - at your disposal, yet you still decide to type out of your ass. Do some fucking research next time, you failed abortion.walnut wrote:Some of you are pretty ignorant and have no sense of history. Zakk was around long before Dimebag was, and Dime himself even said several times that Zakk was a huge influence on him and pretty much taught him everything he knows about guitar.
Dime started playing in 1990. That's when Pantera's first album came out
Now, if that's to hard for you to grasp, I'll break it down for you mathematically, you freakin' moron.
1990 is TEN YEARS after 1980. Therefore, Zakk was around ten years before Dime. Understand? You are the dumbest person I've ever talked to in my life.
By the way, your sig is lame and unoriginal.
I emailed Phil Anselmo himself a few years back, asking him about these so called albums and whether or not they ever really did exist. I recieved no response. I then met him at an autograph signing several months later and asked him in person. All he did was kick my ass.vulgarstrength wrote:can you explain metal magic, projects in the jungle, power metal? did these albums not exist?walnut wrote:Maybe YOU should do some research. Zakk played guitar for Ozzy when he left Black Sabbath and started a solo career...in 1980.walking_ash wrote:Both, being almost the same age, started playing about the same time in their lives. Dime has been doing Pantera since '82, Zakk joined Ozzy in '87, and was unknown before that. Now, how in the fuck did Zakk Wylde teach Dime how to play when Dime was playing long before they ever met? You have an entire knowledge-base - known as the internet - at your disposal, yet you still decide to type out of your ass. Do some fucking research next time, you failed abortion.walnut wrote:Some of you are pretty ignorant and have no sense of history. Zakk was around long before Dimebag was, and Dime himself even said several times that Zakk was a huge influence on him and pretty much taught him everything he knows about guitar.
Dime started playing in 1990. That's when Pantera's first album came out
Now, if that's to hard for you to grasp, I'll break it down for you mathematically, you freakin' moron.
1990 is TEN YEARS after 1980. Therefore, Zakk was around ten years before Dime. Understand? You are the dumbest person I've ever talked to in my life.
By the way, your sig is lame and unoriginal.
It crosses that line when you say it out loud. How many dudes in a gym do you hear telling each other "nice calves, brah!"?walnut wrote:What, so a man can't admire another man's calves without being called gay now? Freakin' grow up kid.CliffandJason-BASS wrote:if you liked his calves, then your gay.
Everything else aside, he seemed pretty serious about Zakk's calves.The Fear wrote:Stop arguing with a joke account.
I would tell someone if I thought they had nice calves, or suspected they had nice calves in which case I would ask that they lift up their pant legs in order to confirm my suspicions.walking_ash wrote:It crosses that line when you say it out loud. How many dudes in a gym do you hear telling each other "nice calves, brah!"?walnut wrote:What, so a man can't admire another man's calves without being called gay now? Freakin' grow up kid.CliffandJason-BASS wrote:if you liked his calves, then your gay.
Shut the fuck up.GoddamnElectric wrote:Yeah, Comes With The Fall is a famous band. They should have gone with somebody from some cover band that nobody has ever heard of before, that way the band could have actually stayed good.
Or they could have gone with Phil Anselmo, who tried out... That would have been freaking awesome.
Phil doesn't belong in AIC. Horrible fit. He can't harmonize with Cantrell.GoddamnElectric wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lygKHgboZVw
Phil looooooves them. A match made in Heaven. Or Hell, as it may be... So much better than that William Duvall.. he sounds like Sebastian Bach. AIC needs somebody with any grime in their voice or else it just sounds silly.
EPIC LAWLZ.summers_eve wrote:Phil doesn't belong in AIC. Horrible fit. He can't harmonize with Cantrell.GoddamnElectric wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lygKHgboZVw
Phil looooooves them. A match made in Heaven. Or Hell, as it may be... So much better than that William Duvall.. he sounds like Sebastian Bach. AIC needs somebody with any grime in their voice or else it just sounds silly.
P.S. - you don't know what you're talking about.
P.S.S.- STFU.
You raise an interesting point, but you're forgetting one very simple fact: Zakk Wylde's calves are RIPPED AS HELL.GoddamnElectric wrote:EPIC LAWLZ.summers_eve wrote:Phil doesn't belong in AIC. Horrible fit. He can't harmonize with Cantrell.GoddamnElectric wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lygKHgboZVw
Phil looooooves them. A match made in Heaven. Or Hell, as it may be... So much better than that William Duvall.. he sounds like Sebastian Bach. AIC needs somebody with any grime in their voice or else it just sounds silly.
P.S. - you don't know what you're talking about.
P.S.S.- STFU.
The point stands: anybody with any kind of grime in their voice is a better fit for AIC than William Duvall. Phil would kick a lot more ass in AIC than Duvall. Duvall isn't too bad, he's cool and all. But Jerry Cantrell is already the smooth voice of AIC. Having Duvall in the band is just like having 2 of Jerry, they're both smooth. AIC's trademark was the grimey tortured voice of Layne and now they've opted to not have any grimey tortured singing in the band, even though they easily could have got somebody with character in their voice, like Phil. Phil's definetly far from the best choice, but he'd be better than Will.
Sure you are, you're just metro like the dude in your avatar.walnut wrote:I would tell someone if I thought they had nice calves, or suspected they had nice calves in which case I would ask that they lift up their pant legs in order to confirm my suspicions.walking_ash wrote:It crosses that line when you say it out loud. How many dudes in a gym do you hear telling each other "nice calves, brah!"?walnut wrote:What, so a man can't admire another man's calves without being called gay now? Freakin' grow up kid.CliffandJason-BASS wrote:if you liked his calves, then your gay.
Just last week I saw this guy at the gym with really ripped looking glutes. I went over and squeezed them and it turns out he was a complete homophobe just like you. Freaking guy couldn't even let another guy admire the firmness of his muscles without calling him gay.
Just for the record, I'm not gay.
hawalnut wrote:I don't get how you guys can say that Dime was better than Zakk. I'll break it down for you in a way you can understand.
Dime was just a guitar player.
Phil is just a singer.
Zakk can both sing AND play the guitar, which makes him multi-talented. Therefore, he's better than both of them put together. Understand?
stoic wrote:good news...everyone took that at face value and immediately stopped thinking you're a scared dork fuck.
you are way over-thinking it. they found a guy they like and he does a great job. there's no more to it than that. as long as jerry cantrell is in the band it will be very AIC-ish anyway, even if the other vocalist is different. he was a much bigger part of the AIC sound than people realize.GoddamnElectric wrote:I don't mind that Layne's not there. I just think a Sebsatin Bach type singer isn't right for AIC. You act like there aren't a million singers with harsh voices out there. I mean, Phil's one of 'em. Even if it's just somebody's voice ravaged with age, it'll fit with AIC's sound better than somebody who's all smooth like Duvall. I'm sure Duvall kicks a lot of ass, I'm just sad that they're not what they could be.
stoic wrote:good news...everyone took that at face value and immediately stopped thinking you're a scared dork fuck.
I'm not over-thinking anything, I just don't like the way it sounds with Duvall's smooth voice. I know AIC opened for Kiss, but I thought they had put their glam days behind them. Guess not. ;)Lord of This World wrote:you are way over-thinking it. they found a guy they like and he does a great job. there's no more to it than that. as long as jerry cantrell is in the band it will be very AIC-ish anyway, even if the other vocalist is different. he was a much bigger part of the AIC sound than people realize.GoddamnElectric wrote:I don't mind that Layne's not there. I just think a Sebsatin Bach type singer isn't right for AIC. You act like there aren't a million singers with harsh voices out there. I mean, Phil's one of 'em. Even if it's just somebody's voice ravaged with age, it'll fit with AIC's sound better than somebody who's all smooth like Duvall. I'm sure Duvall kicks a lot of ass, I'm just sad that they're not what they could be.
and every other alternative rock fagboy has a fake harsh cobain voice. with layne you had a guy with a strange tone AND impressive range/technical ability. i personally don't think phil would fit in AIC at all. his performance with them was not what everyone made it out to be.
walnut wrote:I would tell someone if I thought they had nice calves, or suspected they had nice calves in which case I would ask that they lift up their pant legs in order to confirm my suspicions.walking_ash wrote:It crosses that line when you say it out loud. How many dudes in a gym do you hear telling each other "nice calves, brah!"?walnut wrote:What, so a man can't admire another man's calves without being called gay now? Freakin' grow up kid.CliffandJason-BASS wrote:if you liked his calves, then your gay.
Just last week I saw this guy at the gym with really ripped looking glutes. I went over and squeezed them and it turns out he was a complete homophobe just like you. Freaking guy couldn't even let another guy admire the firmness of his muscles without calling him gay.
Just for the record, I'm not gay.
down ass chic wrote:takes one to noone SLUT!
chill dude. it's not gonna ruin your life or anything if it sucks. you make it sound like it's your band or something. i'm a huge pink floyd fan but i consider their "discography" to be from Saucerful of Secrets to The Wall. they have other albums but to me they don't sound like the same band and those albums don't matter to me. just like metallica is kill 'em all to justice. anything after that is irrelevant to me. if you don't like the album don't listen to it. it bums me out when great bands make shitty albums, but it's not that big of a deal. life goes on.GoddamnElectric wrote:I'm not over-thinking anything, I just don't like the way it sounds with Duvall's smooth voice. I know AIC opened for Kiss, but I thought they had put their glam days behind them. Guess not. ;)Lord of This World wrote:you are way over-thinking it. they found a guy they like and he does a great job. there's no more to it than that. as long as jerry cantrell is in the band it will be very AIC-ish anyway, even if the other vocalist is different. he was a much bigger part of the AIC sound than people realize.GoddamnElectric wrote:I don't mind that Layne's not there. I just think a Sebsatin Bach type singer isn't right for AIC. You act like there aren't a million singers with harsh voices out there. I mean, Phil's one of 'em. Even if it's just somebody's voice ravaged with age, it'll fit with AIC's sound better than somebody who's all smooth like Duvall. I'm sure Duvall kicks a lot of ass, I'm just sad that they're not what they could be.
and every other alternative rock fagboy has a fake harsh cobain voice. with layne you had a guy with a strange tone AND impressive range/technical ability. i personally don't think phil would fit in AIC at all. his performance with them was not what everyone made it out to be.
I'm looking forward to AIC's new album coming out but I'm very afraid it'll sound like Comes With The Fall or Judas Priest.
stoic wrote:good news...everyone took that at face value and immediately stopped thinking you're a scared dork fuck.
Chill? Ain't like I'm standing on a ledge over this. But a new AIC album with modern production could be amazing. Or it could be glam hard rock.Lord of This World wrote:chill dude. it's not gonna ruin your life or anything if it sucks. you make it sound like it's your band or something. i'm a huge pink floyd fan but i consider their "discography" to be from Saucerful of Secrets to The Wall. they have other albums but to me they don't sound like the same band and those albums don't matter to me. just like metallica is kill 'em all to justice. anything after that is irrelevant to me. if you don't like the album don't listen to it. it bums me out when great bands make shitty albums, but it's not that big of a deal. life goes on.GoddamnElectric wrote:I'm not over-thinking anything, I just don't like the way it sounds with Duvall's smooth voice. I know AIC opened for Kiss, but I thought they had put their glam days behind them. Guess not. ;)Lord of This World wrote:you are way over-thinking it. they found a guy they like and he does a great job. there's no more to it than that. as long as jerry cantrell is in the band it will be very AIC-ish anyway, even if the other vocalist is different. he was a much bigger part of the AIC sound than people realize.GoddamnElectric wrote:I don't mind that Layne's not there. I just think a Sebsatin Bach type singer isn't right for AIC. You act like there aren't a million singers with harsh voices out there. I mean, Phil's one of 'em. Even if it's just somebody's voice ravaged with age, it'll fit with AIC's sound better than somebody who's all smooth like Duvall. I'm sure Duvall kicks a lot of ass, I'm just sad that they're not what they could be.
and every other alternative rock fagboy has a fake harsh cobain voice. with layne you had a guy with a strange tone AND impressive range/technical ability. i personally don't think phil would fit in AIC at all. his performance with them was not what everyone made it out to be.
I'm looking forward to AIC's new album coming out but I'm very afraid it'll sound like Comes With The Fall or Judas Priest.
also i haven't listened to it in years but wasn't the self-titled album mostly cantrell on vocals? for some reason i'm thinking it was and i don't remember it being that bad. it's not in the same league with Facelift and Dirt and Jar of Flies but i don't remember disliking it. i don't think Layne's voice wasn't the thing that made them what they were. Cantrell's songwriting was a much bigger part of it, in my opinion. layne was the icing on the cake.
and what makes you think it will sound like Judas Priest? duvall has never reminded me of that kind of thing. to be completely honest, when i saw them live a few times i forgot layne wasn't on stage. he did the songs justice and then some.
well, the Division Bell is good. i don't love it though. and as for piper i just don't like syd barret. to me floyd without gilmour is pretty much worthless.GoddamnElectric wrote:Chill? Ain't like I'm standing on a ledge over this. But a new AIC album with modern production could be amazing. Or it could be glam hard rock.Lord of This World wrote:chill dude. it's not gonna ruin your life or anything if it sucks. you make it sound like it's your band or something. i'm a huge pink floyd fan but i consider their "discography" to be from Saucerful of Secrets to The Wall. they have other albums but to me they don't sound like the same band and those albums don't matter to me. just like metallica is kill 'em all to justice. anything after that is irrelevant to me. if you don't like the album don't listen to it. it bums me out when great bands make shitty albums, but it's not that big of a deal. life goes on.GoddamnElectric wrote:I'm not over-thinking anything, I just don't like the way it sounds with Duvall's smooth voice. I know AIC opened for Kiss, but I thought they had put their glam days behind them. Guess not. ;)Lord of This World wrote:you are way over-thinking it. they found a guy they like and he does a great job. there's no more to it than that. as long as jerry cantrell is in the band it will be very AIC-ish anyway, even if the other vocalist is different. he was a much bigger part of the AIC sound than people realize.GoddamnElectric wrote:I don't mind that Layne's not there. I just think a Sebsatin Bach type singer isn't right for AIC. You act like there aren't a million singers with harsh voices out there. I mean, Phil's one of 'em. Even if it's just somebody's voice ravaged with age, it'll fit with AIC's sound better than somebody who's all smooth like Duvall. I'm sure Duvall kicks a lot of ass, I'm just sad that they're not what they could be.
and every other alternative rock fagboy has a fake harsh cobain voice. with layne you had a guy with a strange tone AND impressive range/technical ability. i personally don't think phil would fit in AIC at all. his performance with them was not what everyone made it out to be.
I'm looking forward to AIC's new album coming out but I'm very afraid it'll sound like Comes With The Fall or Judas Priest.
also i haven't listened to it in years but wasn't the self-titled album mostly cantrell on vocals? for some reason i'm thinking it was and i don't remember it being that bad. it's not in the same league with Facelift and Dirt and Jar of Flies but i don't remember disliking it. i don't think Layne's voice wasn't the thing that made them what they were. Cantrell's songwriting was a much bigger part of it, in my opinion. layne was the icing on the cake.
and what makes you think it will sound like Judas Priest? duvall has never reminded me of that kind of thing. to be completely honest, when i saw them live a few times i forgot layne wasn't on stage. he did the songs justice and then some.
I know there was a heck of a lot to AIC other than Layne's voice. But ofr me the vocal is the most important part. Self-titled had more Cantrell vocals than usual but it still had plenty of Layne, probably more than Jerry, I have no clue. But Jerry's smooth voice is cool, whereas Duvall's voice, to me, is glam.
I'm sure Duvall can do tons of justice to the songs live, but to me he sounds like Sebastian Bach on CD. And I don't like that osund for AIC. Maybe he will do justice on the album, but the few samples I've heard of him doing AIC has not matched my fancy.
Tripod was really dark. If they do something more like that then it'd probably be great.
And I love all of Floyd's albums. ;)
stoic wrote:good news...everyone took that at face value and immediately stopped thinking you're a scared dork fuck.
Yeah, that's EXACTLY what all the fans of Queen, The Doors, Alice In Chains, and Blind Melon said.washburnML wrote:Dimebaggage wrote:are you kidding? we will never see any of those bands reform.GoddamnElectric wrote:Upcoming could be Nirvana, Death, Mother Love Bone, and Pantera.