Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:48 pm
by croninburg
PABassPlayer wrote:Has Gibson lost their damn mind?

http://cgi.ebay.com:80/2008-Gibson-Reve ... dZViewItem
Looks a fuckload better than the reverse flying V

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:13 pm
by Gor-Gor
thats pretty terrible. wtf is that headstock supposed to be?

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:47 pm
by Balls On Parade
try this old one on for size...



Image

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:53 pm
by tokin20deuce
i think the most i'd pay for a guitar is about 5g. I can't fathom spending much more than that, and i doubt the quality is that much different after about 5g.

oh I prefer les pauls by the way, although explorers are decent as well. i HATE sg's tho...not that anybody was askin about that.

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:46 pm
by CFH Eternal
I'd still trade my right nut for this flying v custom in silverburst or any color.
Image

That being said I would still glady trade/sell my Orville (Gibson Japan) LP for a real Gibson (pre-chambered body) LP standard in tobacco sunburst or a goldtop.

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:32 am
by FBS
blah blah gibson gay who cares, i want a prs.

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:16 pm
by slay
Gibsons play and sound decent but they usually have that ugly bean sprout look.

Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 12:50 am
by Wrona
les paul, but the quality to price ratio gives me an aneurism

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:51 pm
by Wagner Vajagner
I have an explorer. I love it.

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:44 am
by Wrona
I'd go for a les paul, but at the same token i would probably go for another brand with more bang... (tone if you will) for the buck. Probably an esp.

I used to have an 87 studio, and it sounded great and played awesome despite the huge neck profile. Wish i never sold it. All the new studios i have played feel like a walmart guitar... what a shame. :no:

Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 8:52 am
by Motorhead
Wagner Vajagner wrote:I have an explorer. I love it.
Explorer's ftw